Full Moon Bat Fantasy, SciFi and Anime iPhone 5 Cases

Introduction

Maybe it was just a few extra keystrokes a few times too many.  Maybe it was having to make those keystrokes not just in test versions of the Apple iPhone operating system, iOS, but in the standard version on my wife’s iPhone.  Maybe I simply got up on the wrong side of my shallow depression in the winter grass today.  Whatever the reason, I’m about to raise a stink.  And it ain’t my usual stinky feral dog-coat stink.

Experimental

Lets’ do some science.  This is pretty convincing.

Pull out your iPhone

Go to Contacts

Begin to add a contact (hit the + sign)

Scroll down to “add related name” and click it

Whatever “type” comes up (like “mother”), click on the type

You will see a list.

Results

This will likely be close to the list you will see.  This is what I see.

mother
father
parent
brother
sister
child
friend
spouse
partner
assistant
manager
other

Add Custom Label

If you have already created a custom label, like “husband” or “wife”, it will appear below the item “Add Custom Label” that you used to create it.

(Dear Apple political monitors – please pass this note on to your technological slavs I MEAN slaves (this is a joke about the original slaves being “white”) that they need to NOT automatically turn on capitalization at the beginning of the custom label, thus matching all the lower-case labels.  Just a helpful bit of user feedback which is strangely necessary after Apple went rabidly PC and lost its innovative edge, and something which Apple ALWAYS used to catch.  Just sayin’.)

That’s it.  You have just finished the “Results” section.

Discussion of Results

You will note that, for 1%-ers like Tim Cook, the helpful label of “assistant” is there.  You will also note that, for schmoes like Dilbert, Alice, Asok, you and me – and even Wally – the regretful but still helpful label of “manager” is there.  But for all of us marrieds, INCLUDING TIM COOK, there is neither “husband” nor “wife”, but instead, only the oddly annoying “spouse”.

Now – I am under the distinct impression that these terms – husband and wife – used to be there.  In fact, I don’t recall being annoyed with their absence until quite recently, so I am rather sure about this.

So allow me to do a Jeffersonian W. T. F.

thomas_jefferson_wtf

Discussion

Obviously the traditional terms “husband” and “wife” are no longer provided by Apple.  Almost as obviously – those terms used to be there.  Clearly, the terms were removed.  And if my wolf ears are perking up properly, I’m pretty sure it was AFTER Apple started getting visibly political, and maybe even AFTER the Sea Island conspiracy against Donald Trump and his supporters, of which I happen to be one.

In any case, I can imagine that there are multiple ways that Apple might justify this apparently idiotic move.  Some of those ways will be direct defenses which admit the action.  Others will be specious claims that avoid the truth, and provide false rationales.  We know how the left operates.

Let’s just look at all of their bogus defenses in advance.  I will lump them all under the term “Specious Claims”, since even the direct defenses are specious, too.

Specious Claim Number One: “Husband and wife are homophobic terms.”

Husband and wife are clearly not racist, but they do have something to do with sex, and therefore the next-in-line, all-purpose defense to be mustered is presumably the badly-coined term “homophobia”.  So let’s look at that one more closely.

You probably know gays and lesbians.  I know that I certainly do.  Maybe Tim Cook does, too.  Now, for some reason – I’m not exactly sure why – I rarely hear any lesbian refer to her “wife”.  Maybe that’s just a regionalism, here in the Agro-American sector of Rustbeltistan.  “Partner” seems to be the big one.  However, almost every married gay I know – including some of the very first to get married in America – calls his husband his husband.  I had gotten quite used to that, to be honest.

So NO.  This is not helping gays and lesbians.  Unless “helping” is taking on the usual proggie-comm definition, where “helpful” is not determined by those who are “helped”.

Specious Claim Number Two: “Husband and wife are transphobic terms.”

Transphobia” is newer, less familiar, and thus the specious leftist excuse du jour.  But it works no better.  In fact, let me dispatch this quickly with a single question.  How is a “trans person” who desires to call their spouse a “husband” or “wife”, any different from a gay person who wants to call his or her husband his or her husband?  Is one somehow more entitled to annoying presumptive patronization than the other?

Specious Claim Number Three: “Adding husband and wife would make the list too long, or in some other way be onerous to Apple.”

Adding one term to the convenience list doesn’t seem like a valid argument in Apple User Convenience World, still allegedly ruled by the Ghost of Steve Jobs, when EVERY Apple iPhone user who wants to use “husband” or “wife” has to add the terms, and that simply has to be a LOT of users.  And a lot more effort than – at most – a few hundred bytes in the entire OS.

While there is a counterargument that “spouse” cannot be deleted, and thus TWO more items have to be added, I counter that the terms “husband” and “wife” are far more useful than “assistant” and “manager”, to say nothing of “other” – particularly the latter when the great feature “Add custom label” exists.

A “great feature?”  There you go, Google/Snopes.  Your “debunking” page which says that I actually complimented Apple will now work, technically, although it will still be evil.

But now for the biggie, which is where things actually get “sciencey”.

Specious Claim Number Four: “Testing did not reveal any need to include the terms.”

I will admit to having inside data on this one.  I myself, as one of many Apple testers, did not say anything about “husband” and “wife” being MIA.  Some of this was due to the great new feature of “Add custom label”, which allows for a workaround of adding the terms by hand, which I very much wanted to test.  And Apple certainly got a lot of testing by leaving out the terms, I am quite sure.  Cunning, cunning, cunning.  But then – interestingly – they never added the terms back in the version rolled out to the public.

More cunning.  Much more cunning.

Now I said there was another reason, but let me put that off for a moment, and get back to Apple leaving out the “test-provoking” absent terms, after their job as absent terms was over.

In a way which can be deeply satisfying only to those of us who study the academically forbidden “conspiracy theory” of cultural Marxism, this is a beautiful example of how cultural Marxism pulls off some of its sneakiest works.  That capability being through the “look Ma, no hands” method of steering a larger-scale goal through a series of smaller, plausibly deniable wickets, none of which overtly reference or obviously imply the larger goal.

Which in this case, is effectively to gently de-legitimize the terms “husband” and “wife”.

They say that “the Devil is in the details”, but in a Feynmanesque way, we must be sure to look at the other end of the universe, too.  The Devil is just as much in the big picture, when the big picture is what’s to be hidden or denied.

Thus we are led to the final defense – the idea that nobody (like me) complained about the terms being absent, and thus they could be left out without consequence.

Almost everybody can see that this is flawed reasoning, by simple common sense, although not everybody can articulate the explanation, which is vast and subtle.  But let’s try – on at least two points.

We already saw that testing/observation itself disturbed the scenario (rather beautiful, that), but let’s ignore even that point, and assume that every test user who received positive internal feedback by adding “husband” and/or “wife” as a kind of built-in test, was not influenced in any way to not then report what seemed like an intentional omission as a bug, and thus not assuming at that moment that Apple knew what it was doing, and might add the terms back later (sorry if I keep repeating this point, but I want everybody to get it).

No.  There is ANOTHER reason that I, personally, and I’m sure most other testers who missed the terms “husband” and “wife”, did not submit bug reports for the missing terms.  The “second reason” of my own sloth in filing a bug report, that I referred to earlier.

That reason is PC conditioning, of which I was fully conscious at the time, in a kind of blessed state of introspection, if not mindfulness.  In fact, there is even further proof of this point by the very fact that I am BREAKING PC conditioning to make this blog post – that I am using my Blog Amplifier to send this message to Apple, and am not including it in actual feedback, which would surely be ignored, as anyone who has EVEN PARTIALLY BROKEN PC conditioning can attest.

There is a companion to “virtue signaling”, and that is “sin self-silencing”.  The problem is, the “sins” are not even sins in my book.  In fact, I can almost be sure of the fact that more people would WANT the terms “husband” and “wife” added, than would oppose their addition.  That those people would be, in fact, the voices I would respect the most.  And yet the radical left, which controls our media from a minority status, can still silence me by yelling at everybody.  Why?  Because the effect isn’t even conscious.  It all operates swiftly, silently, and assuredly, at a subconscious level.

There is a saying that “PC kills”, but I love to extend that by saying “PC kills, but before it kills, it makes dumb and crazy.”

The likely failure of sufficient users to report the absence of “husband” and “wife” as a bug is a perfect example of how people simply don’t speak up, when PC creeps from where it once was to where it now is.  How it dumbs us all down, and leads to a kind of mass psychosis, where larger truths are simply not spoken.

This is, in the small, the same reason that so many people could be media-molested into not supporting (or not openly supporting) Donald Trump, when every logical reason said he was their ideal candidate.  However, by the same token, Donald Trump understood this, and played a cunning game of springing cultural Marxist traps long before he was supposed to walk into them.  If not an actual genius, a brilliant tactician.  Personally, I am betting on both.

And thus, as an eager student of this Donald Trump, I am now doing the same thing, badly but (non-josh) earnestly, by leap-frogging Apple’s cultural Marxist machinery.

Conclusions

I will not claim that I am the first to spot Apple’s cunning little ploy to “spouse” us all.  Just because Google/Snopes does not report anything that I could find on this point, and just because the derivative search engine DuckDuckGo does not report anything, does not mean that others have not attempted to report this small shot fired at us in the information culture wars.  However, I have the added advantage of having a small readership in wonderful places, such as a certain Last Refuge, and thus I hope that the point will spread.

Who knows?  Apple may take certain bug reports only BECAUSE those channels are being unintentionally observed.  That, too, is rather beautiful.

hillary_1984_apple_ad_2016_remake

the_untouchables_cast_1961

Folks, it’s time.

At long last, it is time to utterly and – if needed – at GUNPOINT – end the corruption which has taken over the government of the United States of America.

It’s like Donald Trump says.  We have to get tough.

Very tough.

Hillary Clinton – the Ma Barker of globalist corruption – threatens to expand “Dirty Barack” Obama’s scandalous Chicago-style administration into a new and extremely dangerous criminal enterprise.  Wikileaks has exposed lie after lie, as scofflaw Hillary Clinton commits crimes which make the Watergate family of scandals PALE in comparison.  She has lied to Congress, destroyed evidence, and obstructed justice over, and over, and over again.

But wait.  It gets worse.

Crooked Hillary Clinton, with the crooked assistance of Crooked Loretta Lynch, and now, it appears, with the crooked assistance of her crooked donor, Crooked James Comey, subverted the FBI investigation into her crimes.

OK.  So the criminals in Washington have subverted the very top of the FBI.  Could ANYTHING be worse?

Yes.  It gets worse.

We now learn that over a half-million dollars – maybe a million and a half – went from Hillary Clinton’s notorious bag-man, Terry McAuliffe, to the wife of the the Deputy Director of the FBI, in the form of shady donations to her campaign for public office.

Exactly the kind of corruption which was expected when the establishment Republicans stepped aside, letting well-known Hillary goon McAuliffe beat prosecutor Ken Cuccinelli for the Virginia governorship.

I repeat.  This monster bribe went right below Crooked Director Jim Comey, to Crooked Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

The Deputy Director of the FBI who – it just happens – was leading the investigation of Hillary Clinton and her illegal, subversive, and possibly treasonous email server.

This is a level of corruption which is – very bluntly – intolerable by even casually honest people.  The FBI itself is now utterly tainted – possibly beyond any form of immediate repair.

I am thus calling on Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, and Michael Flynn – as the likely President and top law enforcement officials of the Trump administration – to not only appoint special prosecutors as needed, but to do something even more important.


 

In the name of all patriots and decent Americans I have ever known, of all political stripes, I call on Donald Trump to re-create The Untouchables.  A group of men and women, inside law enforcement and beyond, who are utterly incorruptible.  Men and women who would burn every worldly possession they have – who would renounce every friendship and even their own kin – rather than tell a lie.  Men and women sworn to defend only three things –

TRUTH, JUSTICE, and the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA.

eliot_ness_credentials

playboy-donald-trump-199003-tease_pic

Update: This post was written before intrepid alt-journalism had almost completely debunked Trump’s accusers through a combination of witnesses and detective work.  It was also written before James O’Keefe had caught a different part of the Hillary dirty tricks operation on video, for planned provocations, crybully false accusations, and violence against Trump supporters at Trump rallies.  Indeed, one witness recalls Trump behaving very properly as his primary accuser – now a Hillary minion of some kind – put the heavy hit on HIM.  LOL.  Best election ever!  Anyway, the unedited text follows, because the arguments are still good.  And the payout even better.  Carlos Slim’s wallet is gonna be rather slim when this is over.


OK.  This may take some explaining.  Especially since the above picture is only half-way back through the time portal of which I speak.

There are stories now – which will make absolutely no difference in how I’m going to vote – which accuse Donald Trump of acting like it was the 1970’s, during the 1970’s.  Or maybe it was the 1980’s.  One of those.  Not sure I want to re-open the bird-pooped pages of the New York Times to find out.

Anyway, it appears that Trump pawed at women.  Back when guys pawed at women.  And back when – if you looked like Trump – women pawed at guys.

You know, I think the left had a name for it.  “Sexual revolution”?  Maybe that was it.  Something like that.  We were supposed to be “liberated”.  Yeah.  That’s the word.

So – I have to be honest – all this “grope talk” is doing for me, is to exonerate Donald Trump, and possibly raise his pedestal of manly awesomeness even higher, if that is actually possible.

Why?  Well, it has me remembering the awesome days before PC. Back when I was young, thin, good looking, and had amazing hair.

Specifically, it reminds me of that era in the late sixties through the seventies, and into the 80’s, when PC was actually a joke.  “Political correctness” was considered such an Orwellian idea, that one simply had to laugh.  It would never, actually, happen.  Right?

Anyway, I don’t really want to spell out all things romantic in GORY detail, but I think each of us would do well to remember what dating, courtship, romance and lovemaking were like, back then.

Come on – they’re good memories.  Bring ’em back!

Bring back the sideburns, the polyester suits, the huge cuffs and wide ties, the big hair or the long, ironed hair, the bell-bottom jeans and T-shirts, and all the rest.  The clogs, the platforms, the plastic boots and maybe even the butt-ugly waffle-stompers.

I sure remember those days, when men were supposed to, not necessarily be aggressive, but at least show some uninvited interest.  Because if you didn’t – as the girls then would whisper in hushed giggles – “something was wrong”.  Indeed, I was accused more than once by women of being too gentlemanly. Only one of my friends was ever routinely considered too aggressive.

So what does this mean for Trump?  Why does this matter?

It’s very simple. No matter what the facts in any of these cases happen to be, those facts need to be judged within their OWN time frame – and NOT by the somewhat psychotic PC standards of the modern left.

For example, I know that, as a boy back then – sneaking looks at Playboy Magazine when we could – most of us would have thought that a rich jet-setter “putting the moves” on a woman in an airplane was something like a tale from Mount Olympus.

WE COULD ONLY DREAM.

Remember also that there was much drinking and smoking on planes back then.  They were almost like bars in the sky. A completely different world.

Are you enjoying the past?

TOO DAMN BAD.  It’s back to the Obama present, featuring Hillary.

Nooooooooooooo!  

BAM.  We’re back.

So – what have we learned, now that we’ve seen the ghosts of romance past?

Brace yourselves, snowflakes.

I strongly suspect that if Mr. Trump ever met any of these ladies, the facts of the cases are remarkably different from what is being presented to fit today’s political narrative.

Two words: Lena Dunham.

Lena Dunham is the very embodiment of the conflation of past experience with modern social justice narrative. Thoroughly debunked by Nolte at Breitbart, she ended up having to walk back nearly all of her already ambiguous rape claim.  And remember – she didn’t even have the time portal differential working against her story, as the Trump accusers do.

And in the same way that Lena Dunham would have been taken to the cleaners by “Barry’s” lawyers, had he sued, I expect that Donald Trump is going to take these ladies and the Times to the bank for a hefty withdrawal.

This is the risk of not remembering what things were actually like, back before people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ruined them.

Those who don’t remember the past, are not only destined to repeat it under cross-examination on the witness stand – they may have to pay for it, too.

donald-trump-awesome-2

So – “President” Obama sees a straight line between Sarah Palin and Donald Trump.

Let me back up a bit.

I think that one of the most outrageous things about our Poser President is the same thing that he and his Clinton co-conspirators have foisted upon American law enforcement – the idea of parallel construction.  Parallel construction – wherein the police concoct a false story to push people into plea bargaining, ostensibly so as not to reveal “sensitive methods”, is really just framing people by another name.  It is dishonesty snuck into the legal system – and too many of us are simply blind to the cancerous effect this has had.  We have glorified lying in the name of truth – basically, the ultimate primitive of communist thought and deed.

Fast forward to Obama claiming that he, in his alleged brilliance, sees some “straight line” between Sarah Palin and Donald Trump.

Sorry, Obama.  The reality is a rather crooked deconstruction, and despite all the blame-shifting in the world, YOU and especially YOU figure prominently along its path.

Here is what I said on Breitbart, when I first read Obama’s words.

Enjoy some angry truth.


 

I will say it right here – Go to hell, Obama!

Don’t play dumb with us, Obama. You KNEW that Sarah Palin was a false offering to conservatives, in a media-controlled election that was designed to put YOU in the White House. You also knew exactly what you were doing when YOU sent the DOJ and the IRS after the Tea Party, you communist filth.

What you DIDN’T KNOW was that Sarah Palin would realize she was USED by you sick bastards, played cynically by your POW-torture-controlled ringer who told her to stand down. What you DIDN’T KNOW is that she is smarter than you, and began a movement of outraged Americans who did indeed nominate Donald Trump to END your sick socialist state.

Oh, Obama – you sell us your lies – your parallel construction of reality, but we are no longer listening. We know you, we know what you know, and we know you know we know.

GO TO HELL – AND TAKE YOUR EVIL HILLARY WITH YOU.


 

There is indeed a straight gradient from Sarah Palin to Donald Trump.  But the actual connecting path of history is a crooked one, created by an outraged America, fighting back against a corrupt axis of sneaky, lying socialists, who try and fail to thwart us at every turn.

Mark my words, Obama.  You can try to control justice.  You can try to evade justice.  But justice is coming for you, all the same, and it will not stop until your lies are subsumed by its truth.

One of the best memes ever.  Spread the images to all corners of the Trumposphere.

The irony that Tim Cook of Apple supports a woman who ordered IT minions to obstruct justice – OMG – is it possible for the Trump Rebellion to be more Apple than Apple?  Apparently the spirit of Apple is alive and well, but not at the top of Apple.

PS – Rudy seems to be using the new MacBook.  JEALOUS.  My Obama-degraded income makes that kind of hardware unwise at the moment.  More irony.

Enjoy.  -Wolf

From:

https://twitter.com/artwingcon (Art Wing Conspiracy)

Additional Coverage:

It’s a Movement=> Trump “Think Different” Posters Splash Streets of Hollywood

Think Different, Think Bigly – Exceptional Agitprop…

 

ctlodggukaalgmv

 

ctlodgfvuaab1ol

I posted the following today.  Within a day which was largely positive, I read about how the evil media, including Fox and CNN (which I now agree is Hitler), was conspiring to arrange the debates to stop Donald Trump.  I didn’t react too well to the details of what I read.  But, surprisingly, what I said was remarkably calm.  That’s actually the part that scares me.

Andrew Breitbart called me to #WAR, but I should have known.  #WAR is hell.  I still would have gone, even knowing how I feel now.  America is that important.  But I think I would have said goodbye to some part of me, that I knew was going to die, or perhaps just die again.

The captive media really is Hitler.  And I blame it for what it’s doing to America.

Well, back to the liberation.  Here’s a heaping helping of cold anger.


 

At this point, I don’t care. They hate us. We hate them. I’m quite fine with that state of things. These people reject me and my world – they despise me, and the things I believe in. I ask for nothing from them – not even to get out of my way, for I will walk around them.

I used to talk about cold anger when this started, wondering if I really knew what it was. Now, I try to remember what it was like not to feel cold anger. I’m not sure I can.

Will Trump win or lose the debates by their standards? I don’t care. I really don’t care. Trump, who speaks for me, is dead to Bill Kristol, who speaks for them. I say the feeling is mutual. Let them crow and crow that Trump lost. I don’t care. Their world of lies is dead to me.

I expect them to obey the laws we agreed to, and to not harm Mr. Trump. I expect them to let Mr. Trump assume the Presidency in the agreed manner, for we all know he will win any fair election. Should they fail to obey their own agreed laws, then I will take pleasure in what results, without guilt, for justice pleases me, and immediate justice conforming to higher law pleases me even more.

Will I tell them what results, since they so clearly do not know what they are doing, much less the future?

No. They are unworthy. And this is why they will vacate one way or another. These people who hate America, and Americans, are unworthy of the land, the people, and the flag they despise.


 

That was it.

We’ll see.  They say that with prayer, all things are possible.  So I’m gonna pray for this nation.  I would ask that everybody pray for this nation.  For those who refuse, I ask that you pray for the world, or whatever part of it you value.  Because in the end, you ain’t gonna have one, without the other.

As soon as reports of Dylann Roof’s murderous rampage started coming in, I knew one thing for sure.   If the psychotic shooter wasn’t a “hanger-on” at The Last Refuge, a.k.a. Conservative Treehouse – the next one would be.  Too much truth has poured out between the media’s fingers on that blog, for it to go unnoticed.  From blowing apart the Trayvon narrative, while the media dissembled before delusional and financially aspirational black motherhood, to describing the exact truth of “gentle giant” Mike Brown, WEEKS before the media got there, CTH has earned a reputation for fearlessly doing a job that John Podesta’s “psychotic” media refuses to do – to risk being called racist in the pursuit of simple, basic, cub-reporter truth.

The media surely followed Roof to every end of the racist internet that they could, but they made sure – right up top – to link him to as many sites with the word “conservative” in them as they could.  Indeed.  How odd, when so many other well-known racist sites would be that much more salacious – more media-friendly, in their outrageous names.  But why link him to places like “Stormfront”, when the real target is somewhat lower in the media’s sniper scope?

But that’s not the story today.  It’s just one that the enemies of truth would love to pin on CTH, before it destroys their lying Marxist narrative ONE, MORE, TIME.

No – the real story is that the truth isn’t just out there – it is in us.  And now, it’s exploding across the electorate in ways that make those of us with no voice until now – the dispossessed and abandoned – marvel.

Everybody has a theory about Donald Trump, but it was Sundance, the proprietor of CTH, who was one of the first to realize that Trump had the power to set us free.  Free of what? – you might ask.  Ah.  Gotcha.  That is “the test”.  If you know what I’m talking about, even if only by a feeling in your gut, then you get Trump.  If you can’t for the life of you understand what I mean, then you’re unlikely to ever understand.  That’s OK.  Not everybody in 1776 got the revolutionaries, either.  However, what I am going to say may nevertheless be comforting.  Because I’m going to explain Bernie Sanders, too, and there is a good chance that you may like him – and possibly even understand his message.

Trump is not, by any means, a dyed-in-the-wool conservative.  He’s a bit of a latecomer, and probably more of a right-centrist than a real conservative.  You probably understand that – the old left-right axis, updated as needed to apply to current politics.  The left-right axis is a tool that we all use, but it is absolutely useless to describe what is going on now.

Thankfully, most of us have been educated before Common Core came along, with its confusing attempts to teach one person’s quirky thought processes to millions of kids who, in large measure, can see multiple easier ways to do things, including the old standard methods.  We realize that adding a simply Y axis to an X axis can show us some very interesting things – like a football field, or a baseball diamond.

Add a Y axis to the old Left-Right, and call it Independence-Subservience.  That’s it.  I can show you everything you need to know about Donald Trump on a piece of graph paper.  And when I’m done, you’ll understand a whole lot more – about you, me, America, the media, and why a nutter media driving too fast toward globalization causes societal wrecks.

When the most obvious victims of open borders – conservatives – realized that uncontrolled immigration was an existential threat to conservatism, they didn’t realize that it’s really just the flip side of uncontrolled trade being an existential threat to liberalism.  Dig a little deeper, and you can even see ways that both uncontrolled things are a threat to us all – all the way across the political spectrum.  Yes – they are an opportunity, for sure.  But too much of a good thing is almost always a bad thing, and we have sadly, by now, many times vindicated the critics of open borders and unlimited trade, as being at least partially right, in the eyes of most Americans.  When liberals moan about NAFTA and conservatives agree under their breath, you know you’ve reached peak trade-crazy.  Although I would say that passing SECRET LAWS is, if anything, the height of trade-crazy.  Patrick Henry would be shooting at our leaders over that one.  If I am sure of nothing else, it is that.

Why?  Why are we doing such things which so obviously harm Americans and the American way, be they liberal, conservative, black or white?  WHY?

It doesn’t matter.

I repeat.  It doesn’t matter.

I don’t need to go into the excuses, the theories, or even the conspiracy theories.  I don’t need to explain our “leaders”, who have been rolling us down this dark, mad course toward an increasingly tenuous and unstable end.  It doesn’t matter why they’re doing it.  It only matters that we stop them.

I don’t have to define WHO we are independent of, or subservient to, to graph our response, or to equate it to something highly dangerous, but very, very, graphable.  How WE – the test particles, behave in the field is enough to define it.

In fact, I don’t even have to use a graph.  I can just use words, and say WHERE on the graph something resides.

Trump is on the center-right of the X axis.  Bernie Sanders is on the far left of the X axis.  BOTH of them are slightly above center on the Y axis, toward Independence.

The fact that the entire media and governing class is upset at two guys for being slightly above center on the Independence axis, is truly shocking, but not exactly unexpected.  The media – which by and large thinks Americans are horrible rubes who actually need to BE more like foreigners – cannot be reasonably expected to be close to the center.  And they’re not.  They’re down in the lower left corner, although Fox News sits in a large void, fairly right of the Y axis, and “alternative media” balances out the voids everywhere.  Only local news, roughly resembling the news of the ’60’s, sits dead center on X, although somewhat below center on Y.

The psychosis of the major media is this.  They pretend that their viewpoint is the center of America.  They have convinced themselves that not only are they the center of intellectual thought, but that they are even the rightful center of America.  It is this HAL-2000-like conflict that is driving them nuts.  They do what they do, but they cannot equate the response they get, with their position on the graph.  Why aren’t people listening?  Why?  Why?

The governing class are scattered everywhere under the X axis.  Very few of them are above it.  They have come to accept certain ideas as being “global” and “realistic”, yet they don’t quite know how to convince Americans of the rightness of their views, which look increasingly odd to us, the American citizens.  And the situation just gets worse, because when half-baked and un-baked foreigners come into the country legally or illegally, THEY seem reasonable to the governing class.  But then, perversely, the longer immigrants stay here, the more they begin to think like all the rest of the people who invested in America with their entire lives.  Again – contributing to the psychosis of the media class.

The people are all over the map.  The trouble for the governing class, and their media and politically active allies, is that so many of the people at large are above the X axis.  In fact, there are probably enough of them to get Donald Trump elected.  And THAT is why we’re here.

Independence is a very broad term, but we know what it looks like.  It’s when Americans – meaning real people – not the governing class – decide stuff.  Voting – and voting honestly – helps.  The major media tries to change that story, but as we reject it, their psychosis grows.  In response, the media have become like drug pushers on this issue or that issue – “Everybody does it!  Trust us!”  And yet we can’t trust them, because they lie to us about so many things.

The media has become like the cheating spouse who wants us to bring their yoga teacher, Raoul, along on the honeymoon.  Uh – sorry.   The times we caught “Raoul” hiding Trayvon’s Facebook posts, lying about Darren Wilson in Ferguson, and “making space to destroy” in Baltimore were bad enough.  When Raoul asked us to sign secret papers, invite all his friends to live in the house, give Raoul our guns, and take the guns away from the police, while Raoul’s friends took pot-shots at cops – ahem – I think we’ve had QUITE enough of Raoul.

And don’t get me started about Barack Obama.

But now, for people who need simple, here’s simple.

We want to decide who comes into America.

We want to decide what the laws are.

We want the government to enforce the laws we decided.

We don’t want the government to tell us how the laws we decided work.

We don’t want the government to say “we can’t do it”, when even a child knows we can.

We don’t want lies.

We want the right to self-defense, but also streets and cities where we don’t need to use it.

We don’t want cops to be shot by criminals, nor those criminals glorified by race.

We don’t want inaction on things we decide.

We don’t want action on things we didn’t decide.

We don’t want to be convinced to take part in wars.

We don’t want to be told we can’t defend the innocent.

We don’t want to be told to shut up.

We don’t want to be told to listen, who to listen to, or who not to listen to.

We want free speech back.

We want freedom of religion back.

We want America back.

Most of all, we want what Donald Trump wants –

We want to make America great again.

And when we do that, by doing ALL of the things that make America great, on both the left and the right, then we will enable God to do the thing that only he has the power to do, and that only He has the power to judge done.

Make America good again.